During our "retreat," on a night filled with wine, chess games, frisbee, and laughter, the break naturally turned into a work session. Working groups, motivated by enthusiasm (and a bit of alcohol), grouped to tackle some pending tasks. The HAI team was focused on the last finding of the 46 points raised in the two auditing processes.

The finding named “Liquidation DOS” was categorized as "minor severity" in one of the two audit reports, in our opinion, due to the following:

• Low probability of it happening: Getting to the faulty reversal line is only achievable when a precise set of conditions are met, some dynamic over time.
• No immediate profit: There was no possibility of quick profit by exploiting this bug.
• Simple solution through governance: The problem could be solved by modifying some protocol parameters

A troubling question arose after fixing the bug in the HAI code base: "How is it possible that RAI, our role model (since we had copypasta GEB codebase with a few tweaks here and there), is not vulnerable to this same problem?" The absence of a clear answer was alarming: It was!

"It's all laugh and fun until you find a bug live on mainnet, in an ungovernable protocol.”

We decided to call it a night and return to work the next day. Yet not all the *damajuanas* in the world would make us forget about the seriousness of our discovery. Our first task was to confirm the reachability of the bug in RAI, and assess its possible effects on the protocol users, then report back to the Reflexer team to consider the available options and next steps. A bomb had been activated.

Applying the same evaluation criteria for RAI, this was a critical problem and of profound importance due to the ungovernable nature of RAI and its philosophy as a decentralized stablecoin:

• Low probability of it happening: Although low probability, an attacker can engineer an attack.
• No immediate profit: Despite this, it could put the protocol in unhealthy debt and compromise the stability and recapitalization of the system.
• Simple solution through governance: Difficult to implement due to protocol governance limitations.

We’ve spotted a bug alive that, while not involving an immediate loss of funds (funds are safu now!), could leave the protocol vulnerable, possibly forcing a governance shutdown. Given the current state of RAI, it was conceivable that some actors, even at the risk of losing, would choose to exploit the flaw, causing more harm than good.

After communicating our findings, there was a period of silence while the Reflexer team verified the bug. We were determined to find a solution to avoid shutting down the protocol, especially before the launch of HAI, leaving the users with no safe harbour to maintain their collateral-backed debt positions. We did not want to hear the words "Global Settlement" coming out of our partners' mouths.